Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde: Where Digital Innovation Meets the Future of Dentistry

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

In dentistry, precision has always been essential. But for Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde, precision is not simply a standard to maintain. It is an opportunity to keep improving. From Mexico City, he has spent more than fifteen years developing a career that brings together clinical experience, cosmetic dentistry, technology, design, and education, building a practice shaped by one constant principle: there is always a better way to do things.

As the founder of Dental Office by Arciniega, with locations in Polanco and Coyoacán, Dr. Arciniega has developed a practice focused on cosmetic dentistry, implantology, and oral rehabilitation. Yet his professional identity extends well beyond traditional clinical work. His interest in digital dentistry has led him to rethink how technology can influence virtually every stage of the patient experience.

Photo Courtesy: Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde

For Arciniega, digital transformation is not about replacing clinical expertise with technology. It is about using technology to make clinical decisions more precise, treatments more predictable, and outcomes more personalized.

From diagnosis and treatment planning to digital design and manufacturing, each stage can become part of an integrated workflow. This approach has positioned him at the intersection of dentistry and additive manufacturing, eventually leading him to become a Key Opinion Leader (KOL) for SprintRay, where he has participated in the growing conversation surrounding digital production and 3D printing in modern dental practice.

That same curiosity led to another important chapter in 2024, when he co-founded Dental Workshop with his sister, Noemí Yoselin Arciniega Valverde. The laboratory was created not simply as a separate technical facility, but as an extension of the clinical environment.

The concept is straightforward but powerful: when clinicians, designers, and technicians can work more closely together, ideas can move more efficiently from the digital environment to the final restoration. By connecting the planning, design, and manufacturing processes, Dental Workshop reflects a broader shift toward more collaborative and digitally integrated dentistry.

But Dr. Arciniega’s influence is not limited to his own practices or laboratory work.

As a speaker and educator, he shares his experience with dental professionals both in Mexico and internationally, helping demonstrate how emerging technologies can be incorporated into everyday clinical workflows. His presence on social media has also allowed him to reach an audience far beyond the traditional dental community, building a digital following of millions and bringing conversations about oral health, aesthetics, and dentistry to a much wider public.

This commitment to communication extends into Dientes Sanos by Arciniega, his podcast, where dentistry is approached through a more conversational and accessible format. Through the podcast and his digital platforms, complex topics can be transformed into conversations that patients, professionals, and anyone interested in oral health can understand.

Photo Courtesy: Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde

At a time when dentistry is evolving at an unprecedented pace, Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde represents a new generation of professionals who see innovation as more than simply acquiring the latest equipment.

For him, the real challenge is learning how to integrate technology with clinical judgment, creativity, patient sensitivity, and long-term vision.

That combination- clinical experience, digital technology, design, education, and communication– has become the foundation of his professional journey. And as dentistry continues moving toward increasingly digital and personalized models of care, Arciniega is helping shape what that future can look like.

Connect with Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde

Follow Dr. Arturo Arciniega Valverde on Instagram for insights into his clinical work, digital dentistry, and educational content. Additional platforms and resources are available through his official Linktree.

From Failure to Purpose: Burt Tyson Brings History, Honor, and Redemption to the American Western

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

For author Jim Van Laan, writing under the pen name Burt Tyson, the journey into historical Western fiction began with a deeply personal question: what does a person do after losing everything?

That question became the foundation for what would eventually develop into the Devil’s Shadow series, a planned seven- or eight-book saga centered on Captain Robert Hester, a Civil War veteran whose journey takes him from the final days of the conflict into the American frontier and Mexico. Van Laan’s first completed manuscript was actually intended as the sixth book in the series, but he ultimately decided that The Shadow Appears needed to come first. The Shadow Grows follows as the second installment, with a third book, The Shadow Seeks a Home, planned for release.

The origins of the series can be traced back much further than its publication, however.

Van Laan recalls a difficult period in his own life when he experienced both a failed marriage and a failed business. At the time, he was searching for a metaphor that could help him understand failure and, more importantly, how someone could move beyond it. He found that metaphor in the image of a Confederate soldier returning from war to discover that his faith, family, home, and sense of purpose had been destroyed.

That idea became the genesis of the Devil’s Shadow series.

At the center of the story is Captain Robert Hester, a former member of Mosby’s Rangers. As the Civil War draws to a close, Hester is wounded and caught in a complicated world where military loyalties, personal survival, and the consequences of war collide. His story continues beyond the defeated Confederacy and eventually takes him toward Mexico, where he hopes to continue fighting and pursue vengeance against General Stoneman.

Yet Hester is not simply a conventional Western hero.

One of the most compelling elements of the character is the conflict between his capacity for violence and his underlying sense of honor. Hester loses members of his family and becomes consumed by revenge, but Van Laan deliberately avoids presenting him as either entirely good or entirely evil.

Instead, Hester reflects the complicated people the author believes existed during that period: individuals capable of extraordinary violence when protecting those they love, while also being willing to offer compassion and assistance to someone in need.

That moral complexity is particularly important because the world Hester inhabits offers little dependable justice. In the South and on the frontier, formal law enforcement could be distant or practically nonexistent. Communities sometimes had to depend on individuals to enforce their own understanding of right and wrong.

For Hester, that creates a difficult distinction between justice and revenge. His actions may be violent, but Van Laan says the character’s sense of honor helps restrain his darker impulses. The result is a protagonist who must continually confront the question of whether a person can remain fundamentally good while using violent methods in a violent world.

The meaning of the series’ title becomes clearer through Hester’s transformation. After traveling to Mexico, he becomes known as “The Devil’s Shadow,” so named when an evil hacendado says of him, “He is like the shadow before el Diablo; first you see the shadow, and then you see el Diablo.” The defenseless Mexicans he helps call him “The Angel of God,” two names that capture the two opposing forces within him: the honorable man and the man driven by vengeance and violence.

In The Shadow Grows, that internal conflict begins to change.

After abandoning the possibility of continuing the Confederate cause, Hester eventually reaches Copper Canyon without a clear purpose. His encounter with a Mescalero Indian elder becomes a turning point. Rather than remaining a man defined by loss and revenge, he begins developing a new sense of direction.

Van Laan describes The Shadow Grows fundamentally as a story about transformation: the movement from a man without purpose to a man who discovers purpose again.

That transformation is reinforced through unexpected relationships. Hester’s connection with the injured Indigenous woman teaches him survival skills while challenging his assumptions about people and culture. His decision to help others, including a half-dog, half-wolf and a vaquero named Miguel, gradually creates something he believed he had lost forever: family.

These relationships shift Hester’s focus away from revenge and toward connection, responsibility, and belonging.

Van Laan’s ability to build this historical world comes from a lifelong fascination with the Civil War. As a teenager living in Maryland, he was surrounded by major battlefields, including Gettysburg, Antietam, and Monocacy. Decades later, a mentor encouraged him to research the Confederate diaspora, including former Confederate soldiers who traveled to Mexico, Cuba, Brazil, Europe, Egypt, and other parts of the world after the war.

That research eventually found its way into his fiction.

But beneath the history, battles, horses, frontier landscapes, and gunfights is a philosophy that Van Laan says has influenced virtually everything he writes: the Cowboy Code.

For him, the code centers on principles such as keeping one’s word, choosing honesty over deception, recognizing the difference between right and wrong, confronting fear when duty calls, and helping others whenever possible. One of its central ideas is that those capable of protecting people who cannot protect themselves have a moral responsibility to do so.

That philosophy gives The Shadow Appears and The Shadow Grows their deeper identity. They are not simply stories about the American Civil War or the Old West. They are stories about what happens after a person has been broken by circumstances, and whether it is possible to rebuild a life around something greater than anger.

Through Burt Tyson, Jim Van Laan brings together historical research, Western tradition, personal experience, and a belief in self-reliance and moral responsibility. The result is a character-driven series in which the greatest battle is not always fought with weapons.

Sometimes, it is the battle to discover who you are after everything you once believed in has disappeared.

Billy Ray Rock Brings Fresno Pride to the Five Boroughs on “This The Town I’m From”

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

By: Marcus Ellison

New York City has always understood the power of announcing where you come from. In hip-hop, punk, salsa, soul and countless other forms, neighborhood identity is more than background information. It is creative currency. The Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, Harlem and Staten Island have each produced artists who turned street names, subway lines and local struggles into cultural landmarks. Billy Ray Rock taps into that tradition on “This The Town I’m From,” even though his story begins nearly 3,000 miles away in Fresno, California.

Released on August 7, the single is a personal account of Rock’s working-class upbringing on Tuolumne Street. He remembers a family that did not have much, but remained supported by his father’s labor and, eventually, Rock’s own contributions. The food on the table sometimes remained the same for two or three days, but there was food. The lights stayed on. Those details give the song credibility that no broad declaration of hometown pride could manufacture.

New Yorkers know that a city’s public image rarely captures the private reality of living there. The Manhattan skyline may represent New York to outsiders, but residents often define home through apartment buildings, corner stores, playgrounds, subway platforms and the people who remember them before anybody else knew their names. Rock approaches Fresno in much the same way. He is less interested in promoting the city than in explaining what its streets taught him.

The chorus crystallizes that idea with the line, “It’s small but made me strong.” Fresno may not possess New York’s global profile, but Rock refuses to accept that cultural importance is measured by population, wealth or media attention. His hometown gave him humility, discipline, instinct and a work ethic formed by necessity. Those qualities became more valuable than any glamorous mythology he might have invented.

Musically, “This The Town I’m From” reflects Rock’s refusal to remain confined within one genre. Hip-hop gives the record its geographical pride and rhythmic confidence, while country music informs its direct storytelling. Southern soul supplies emotional warmth, R&B adds accessibility, and rock brings muscular energy. Rock’s influences include Earth, Wind & Fire, Prince, Rick James, the Moody Blues and Van Halen, a range that mirrors the eclectic listening habits of an artist raised before algorithms began separating every taste into its own compartment.

That stylistic flexibility should also resonate in New York, where genres have always collided through proximity. A single walk through the city can carry someone past Latin percussion, gospel singing, jazz improvisation, rap blasting from a car and a rock band rehearsing behind a basement door. Rock’s music has a similar openness. It does not sound like a calculated attempt to attract multiple audiences. It sounds like the natural result of listening without prejudice.

Behind the hometown celebration is a profound personal loss. Rock had written the song some time ago, but the death of his wife pushed him into a deeper examination of why he remained alive and what he was meant to do next. He found part of the answer in making and releasing music. “This The Town I’m From” became both a return to his origins and a step toward continuing his life after grief.

That history changes the recording’s emotional meaning. Rock is not reminiscing because nostalgia happens to be marketable. He is revisiting the values and memories that once made him strong because he needs them again. His late wife’s emotional connection to the song and video makes the release especially poignant, yet the track never collapses beneath its sadness. Grief exists under the surface, deepening the pride without overwhelming it.

Rock’s vocal performance is appropriately direct. He does not strain to turn every phrase into a grand dramatic event. Instead, he sounds like someone telling the truth in a language he trusts. That restraint allows the record’s central message to emerge clearly: the places that test people can also prepare them.

The song also challenges assumptions about intelligence in smaller and working-class communities. For Rock, street smarts means relying on instinct, reading people and understanding situations before they become dangerous. New York listeners will recognize that kind of education. It is learned through observation and consequence, whether on a Fresno block or a crowded train platform late at night.

Although Fresno could embrace “This The Town I’m From” as a civic anthem, Rock wants the song to reach beyond California. Its title leaves space for every listener to identify a personal town, borough, neighborhood or block. That universality is one of the record’s strongest qualities. Rock gives audiences enough specific detail to believe his story while keeping the larger sentiment open to anyone proud of their beginnings.

In New York, claiming a neighborhood has always been an act of identity. Billy Ray Rock brings that same conviction to Fresno, showing that hometown pride doesn’t depend on the size of the skyline. “This The Town I’m From” is a resilient, genre-blurring tribute to family, survival, and the streets that teach people how to stand. Fresno may be Rock’s town, but the feeling belongs everywhere.

Leo De Verzay Introduces Its Champagne to a New Generation of Consumers

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

For Charlotte Castagne-Chaudron, Champagne is more than a product. It is a family heritage, a connection to the land and a tradition that has been passed down through generations.

As the eighth-generation wine-grower behind Leo De Verzay Champagne, Castagne-Chaudron remains at the heart of the brand, bringing the character of her family’s vineyard in Verzenay into a modern Champagne experience designed for today’s consumer.

Located in the Montagne de Reims, Verzenay is recognized as a Grand Cru Champagne village, a distinction that reflects the exceptional reputation of its terroir. It is from this setting that the roots of Leo De Verzay begin.

The brand’s identity is closely connected to Castagne-Chaudron’s experience as a grower and to the traditions of her family. While Champagne has long been associated with heritage and craftsmanship, Leo De Verzay approaches that tradition through a contemporary lens, one that places equal importance on quality, presentation, and the experience surrounding the bottle.

Photo Courtesy: Leo De Verzay

Each Leo De Verzay bottle features a certified Swarovski crystal, turning the bottle itself into part of the experience. The attention to detail continues with the cuvées, which are aged for a minimum of three years in the bottle.

For Castagne-Chaudron, however, the essence of the brand remains rooted in Champagne itself.

Her family’s generations of experience in the region provide the foundation for a brand that seeks to introduce the character of French Champagne to consumers beyond its traditional markets. The result is a balance between the heritage of the vineyard and a more contemporary interpretation of luxury.

That vision has become increasingly relevant as Leo De Verzay has expanded its presence in the United States.

Scott Disick, an equity partner in the brand’s American venture, LDV USA, has played a visible role in introducing the Champagne to consumers in the United States, particularly through the lifestyle and entertainment communities that have become an important part of the brand’s American presence. His involvement as a co-owner of the U.S. business has helped connect Leo De Verzay with a new audience while allowing the brand to retain its French identity.

The expansion into the United States gained significant momentum in 2023, when Leo De Verzay announced its availability across Florida through restaurants, bars, clubs, and wine and spirits stores in partnership with Republic National Distributing Company.

Florida provided a natural environment for the brand’s American development. South Florida, particularly Miami, has become closely associated with hospitality, entertainment, fashion and contemporary luxury, an environment where the visual identity and positioning of Leo De Verzay could resonate with a new generation of Champagne consumers.

Appearances by Disick at selected venues helped introduce the product directly to consumers, bringing together the Champagne’s French origins and its emerging American lifestyle presence.

Yet behind the expansion is a story that begins far from the nightlife and hospitality scenes of the United States.

It begins in Verzenay.

For Castagne-Chaudron, the vineyard remains the foundation of everything Leo De Verzay represents. Her position as an eighth-generation wine-grower provides the brand with a direct connection to the Champagne region and to the generations of knowledge behind its production.

Photo Courtesy: Leo De Verzay

That connection is increasingly important as the Champagne category evolves. Today’s consumers are not only interested in what is inside the bottle, but also in the story, craftsmanship, and identity behind the brands they choose.

Leo De Verzay responds to that evolution by bringing together the authenticity of its French roots with a contemporary approach to luxury.

The Swarovski crystal on the bottle creates a distinctive visual signature. The Grand Cru heritage of Verzenay provides a connection to one of Champagne’s most respected terroirs. And the brand’s growing American presence introduces that heritage to consumers who may experience Champagne as part of a broader lifestyle rather than only through traditional occasions.

Castagne-Chaudron remains the central figure in that story.

As the eighth generation of her family to work with Champagne, she represents the continuity between the vineyard’s history and the brand’s future. Her role is not simply to preserve a tradition, but to carry it forward and introduce it to new audiences without losing the identity that began in Verzenay.

As Leo De Verzay continues developing its presence in the United States, that connection between France and America is becoming increasingly central to the brand.

From a Grand Cru vineyard in Verzenay to restaurants, clubs and hospitality destinations across the United States, Leo De Verzay is building a modern interpretation of Champagne, one that keeps its roots firmly planted in the land while opening the door to a new generation of consumers.

At the center of it all is Charlotte Castagne-Chaudron, whose family’s Champagne heritage provides the foundation for Leo De Verzay’s next chapter. Additional updates about the brand are available through the Champagne Mami and Leo De Verzay Instagram accounts.

The Hidden Cost of Giving Managers More People to Lead

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

By: Grace Sullivan

Organizations have spent the past few years quietly flattening their management layers, and the numbers show it. The average number of employees reporting to a single manager in the U.S. rose from 10.9 in 2024 to 12.1 in 2025, according to Gallup, a nearly 50 percent increase in team size since Gallup began tracking the measure in 2013. Large tech companies have eliminated layers of middle management outright. Analyses of recent layoff waves suggest middle managers have absorbed a disproportionate share of the cuts, a trend some now call the “Great Flattening.”

The assumption behind that trend is straightforward. Fewer managers, more direct reports each, lower overhead. What Gallup’s research complicates is the idea that this is free.

The Real Constraint Isn’t Team Size, It’s Time

Gallup’s analysis found that 97 percent of managers carry individual contributor work alongside their leadership responsibilities, tasks like a store supervisor stocking shelves or a technology manager contributing hands-on to the same projects as the team they lead. The median manager spends 40 percent of their time on that kind of work rather than on managing people. Cross a threshold beyond that, and engagement drops, regardless of how many people report to them. Managers who spend less than 40 percent of their time on individual contributor work maintain meaningfully higher engagement than the average.

That distinction, between team size and time available to actually lead, is where the flattening trend runs into a problem most org charts don’t account for. Widening a manager’s span of control without reducing what else is competing for their time doesn’t just redraw reporting lines. It changes how much of the job they were promoted for, developing people, they can actually do.

What Gets Squeezed Out First

Gallup’s research points to one habit that matters more than almost any other for employee engagement: managers giving each employee meaningful, individual feedback at least once a week. Employees who strongly agree they received that kind of feedback in the past week are engaged at roughly seven in ten, regardless of team size. Employees who don’t report that are engaged at closer to one in four. And yet, across a separate Gallup study of nearly 15,000 employees, only 16 percent said their last conversation with their manager was extremely meaningful.

The habit that moves engagement the most is also the one most vulnerable to a manager’s calendar filling up with everything else. A short, regular conversation is easy to skip when a schedule conflict needs resolving, a policy question needs answering for the third time that day, or a stack of survey feedback needs sorting before anyone can act on it. None of that work is optional. All of it competes directly with the fifteen or thirty minutes Gallup’s data says matters most.

Where Workforce Technology Enters the Picture

Tushneem Dharmagadda, founder of the workforce experience and operations platform HubEngage, has watched this tension play out across frontline and distributed organizations, where the administrative load on managers tends to be heaviest and the least visible from the top of the org chart. His view is that most workforce technology investment has been aimed at the wrong side of the equation, adding tools that generate more information for managers to process rather than reducing the volume of low-judgment work competing for their time in the first place.

The distinction he draws is between technology that adds another task to a manager’s list and technology that removes one. Scheduling conflicts handled inside the system rather than escalated, policy questions routed to an automated assistant before they reach a manager, survey feedback delivered already sorted into patterns rather than as a pile of individual responses- each of those is work that would otherwise compete with the fifteen minutes Gallup’s research identifies as the highest-leverage thing a manager can do all week.

Talent Still Matters, But It Needs Room to Show Up

Gallup’s research is careful not to reduce this to a technology problem alone. Manager talent, measured across traits like motivation, collaboration, and analytical thinking, remains the strongest predictor of whether a larger team succeeds or struggles. Talented managers facing large teams and heavy individual contributor workloads maintain higher engagement than less talented managers in the same position. But talent operating inside a calendar with no time left for coaching still produces a coaching conversation that doesn’t happen.

That’s the more precise version of the argument Dharmagadda makes: the goal isn’t fewer managers or lighter oversight; it’s making sure the managers organizations already have, including the talented ones, spend their limited time on the fifteen minutes that move engagement rather than the administrative load that doesn’t.

The Flattening Trend Isn’t Reversing

Nothing in Gallup’s data suggests companies are about to add management layers back. The pressure toward wider spans of control is structural, driven by cost discipline, AI-driven efficiency expectations, and a labor market that rewards leaner org charts. Gallup’s own recommendation isn’t to stop flattening; it’s to make sure organizations know which of their managers have the talent and the time to handle it before they do.

For organizations serious about that second part, time, the answer isn’t found in the org chart. It’s found in how much of a manager’s day gets consumed by work that has nothing to do with the people reporting to them, and how much of that work could disappear before it ever reaches their calendar.

Domain Price Comparison: How to Find the Real Cost of Owning a Domain

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

When people search for a new domain name, the first thing they usually notice is the registration price. A domain might appear to cost only a few dollars for the first year, making it seem like an excellent deal. However, the initial price is only one part of the total cost. Renewal fees, transfer prices, and long-term ownership expenses can make a seemingly cheap domain considerably more expensive over time.

This is why a reliable domain price comparison can be useful before registering a new website address. Instead of looking only at the promotional price offered for the first year, website owners can compare what the domain is likely to cost over several years.

Why the First-Year Domain Price Can Be Misleading

Many domain registrars use introductory prices to attract new customers. A domain extension may have a very low first-year registration fee, but its renewal price can be significantly higher.

For example, someone might register a domain for a promotional price and assume that the same price will continue in future years. When the renewal date arrives, however, the standard annual price may be much higher.

This difference is particularly important for businesses, bloggers, online stores, and other website owners who plan to keep their domains for many years. Saving a few dollars during registration may not matter much if the extension becomes expensive to maintain later.

Look at the Long-Term Cost

A better way to evaluate a domain extension is to consider its total ownership cost rather than focusing exclusively on the first-year promotion.

A long-term comparison can include:

First-year registration cost

Annual renewal fees

Three-year ownership cost

Five-year ownership cost

Transfer pricing

Availability across different registrars

Differences between promotional and standard prices

Looking at these factors gives buyers a clearer idea of what they are actually paying for a domain.

Compare Different TLDs Before Registering

The domain extension, also known as a top-level domain or TLD, can have a major effect on long-term pricing. Popular extensions such as .com, .org, and .net can have very different registration and renewal prices from newer extensions such as .shop, .dev, .tech, or .ai.

The cheapest extension is not necessarily the one with the lowest registration price. In some cases, an extension with a slightly higher initial price can be more affordable over several years because its renewal cost is lower.

This is where comparing multiple extensions before making a decision becomes particularly useful.

How Truetld Helps With Domain Research

Truetld is designed to make this type of research easier by comparing domain extension pricing across multiple registrars. Instead of concentrating only on the advertised first-year price, it shows the estimated cost of keeping an extension over a longer period.

The platform compares pricing across dozens of registrars and provides three-year and five-year cost information. This allows users to see whether an apparently cheap domain extension remains affordable after the initial registration period.

Another useful feature is the pricing verdict system, which helps identify extensions where renewal costs are relatively stable as well as those where the difference between registration and renewal prices is substantial.

Why Renewal Pricing Matters

Imagine that two domain extensions both cost a few dollars to register. At first glance, they may appear equally affordable. However, if one extension has a much higher renewal fee, the long-term cost can be very different.

For anyone building a website for the long term, this distinction matters.

A five-year comparison can provide a more realistic picture because it considers the initial registration cost together with future renewal expenses. This approach can help prevent unexpected costs later.

Choosing a Domain Based on More Than Price

Price should not be the only consideration when choosing a domain extension. Brand recognition, availability, audience expectations, and the purpose of the website should also influence the decision.

For example, a business targeting a global audience may prefer a widely recognized generic extension. A company targeting a particular country may consider a country-code extension more appropriate.

Search engines generally do not give generic domain extensions an automatic ranking advantage simply because of their extension. However, country-code extensions can have geographic relevance for local search.

Therefore, the best domain is usually the one that combines an appropriate name and extension with reasonable long-term costs.

A Simple Way to Compare Domain Costs

Before registering a domain, website owners can follow a few simple steps:

  1. Choose several available domain extensions.
  2. Check the first-year registration price.
  3. Check the standard renewal price.
  4. Calculate the expected three-year and five-year cost.
  5. Compare prices between different registrars.
  6. Consider whether transferring the domain later could reduce the cost.
  7. Select the extension that provides the best combination of price, suitability, and long-term value.

This process takes only a few minutes but can prevent unpleasant surprises when the first renewal arrives.

Think Beyond the Promotional Price

A domain name is not usually a one-year purchase. Most website owners expect to keep their domain for several years, especially when they are building a brand, publishing content, or developing an online business.

For that reason, evaluating the total cost of ownership is more useful than simply searching for the cheapest registration promotion.

A proper domain price comparison gives buyers a better understanding of the financial commitment before they register. It also makes it easier to identify extensions that look inexpensive initially but become costly over time.

Final Thoughts

Choosing a domain should involve more than finding the lowest advertised registration price. Renewal fees and long-term ownership costs can make a significant difference, particularly when a website is expected to operate for many years.

Tools such as Truetld can simplify this research by bringing domain extension prices from multiple registrars together and showing longer-term cost comparisons. By checking the real cost before registering, website owners can make a more informed decision and avoid being surprised by expensive renewals.

Ultimately, the best domain extension is not necessarily the cheapest one on day one. It is the option that makes sense for the website, audience, brand, and long-term budget.

Thirty-Three Years in the Room: David E. Thompson on What Young People Need from the Adults Around Them

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

Some authors write about young people from the outside, working from research and interviews. Others write from the room, having sat across from the child who will not answer the question.

David E. Thompson belongs firmly in the second group.

A veteran track and field coach, certified personal trainer, mental health professional, and working therapeutic mentor, he has spent more than thirty-three years with children, adolescents, young adults, and families. His formal training runs through Sports Administration, Personal Training, and Social and Criminal Justice, which is an unusual combination for someone writing about emotional development, and it shows on the page.

He has now published five books. Two of them are training material for mentors, parents, therapists, and providers. Three of them are journals with blank lines, meant for the young person to fill in. Thompson has kept those audiences deliberately separate, and that decision is the most revealing thing about how he works.

The Coach Who Kept Showing Up

The through line in Thompson’s career is repetition rather than breakthrough. Coaching, personal training, and mentoring all run on the same principle: Someone shows up regularly, watches closely, and adjusts.

That background explains the shape of his writing. He does not deal in single insights. He deals in stages, sessions, checklists, and returns. His books are built to be worked through more than once, by different people, at different points, which is closer to how a season is coached than how a self-help book is usually written.

The need for that kind of work is not in dispute. The CDC’s 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey found that 39.7 percent of high school students experienced persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness, and 28.5 percent reported poor mental health.1

The Two Books He Wrote for the Adults

Therapeutics Mentor: Supporting Children and Family, published in two parts by Kinetic Digital Publishers, is aimed at mentors, parents, therapists, providers, and school staff. Its opening position is stated early and returned to often: children should not be viewed as problems to be fixed.

The first principle follows from that. “A child cannot build emotional and social skills if they do not feel safe,” Thompson writes. He is precise about what he means. Safety does not mean the child will never feel uncomfortable. It means the child knows they will not be mocked, embarrassed, pressured, or rejected during the process.

Part 1 covers the beginning of the work: mentor intake, parent intake, the first mentor-parent-child connection, therapeutic alignment, and early signs of social anxiety. Part 2 moves into application, working through public confidence, healthy friendships, self-care, emotional resilience, diagnosis awareness, and graduation readiness.

What separates the two volumes from most books in the category is how much room Thompson gives to documentation. He specifies what a progress note should show: what happened in the session, what skill was practiced, how the child responded, what goal was addressed, what progress was observed, what challenges remain, and what next step is recommended. His reasoning is practical. Notes like these demonstrate that the service “is not random conversation or casual activity,” which matters when a provider agency or an insurance reviewer needs to understand what a mentor actually did. It is the kind of detail that only comes from someone who has filled out the forms.

The child’s own pages read differently. Explaining trauma responses, the text speaks directly to the young reader: “That does not mean something is wrong with you. It means your body learned to protect you.” A grounding worksheet asks for one thing that feels unsafe, one thing that helps, one safe person, one place to calm down, and one sentence to say to yourself. Six short lines. A child who fills in two has still filled in two.

The Three Books He Wrote for the Young Person

The High School Journal: The Journey to the Path to Success, to a Quality of Life takes a structure the title does not prepare you for. Instead of starting at fourteen, it runs in five levels beginning at ages zero to one, then two to three, four to twelve, thirteen to nineteen, and twenty to twenty-seven. Teenagers are asked to look back at stages they cannot remember and consider what got built there, including what their parents carried into the house.

Level four covers the practical skills that often go untaught, from cooking and cleaning to emotional intelligence, and it says plainly that some families never passed them on. Level five deals with the twenties, and offers advice that cuts against the usual script, describing living with your parents while you get on your feet as a smart move rather than a step back.

1 CDC, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023, MMWR Supplement: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/su/pdfs/su7304a9-H.pdf

The two companion diaries are split by audience, and Thompson’s voice changes noticeably between them.

The Young Men’s Diaryruns in six segments from twelve to thirty and is written the way a coach talks, opening by telling late-developing boys that they are not behind; they are just getting started.

“Confidence comes from skills, not just vibes.” “Reframe failure: it is not identity, it is data.”

The Young Girl’s Diarycovers a similar span in five segments, moving from study and curiosity into self-worth, communication, and protecting your own energy, and its instructions include a line that sits well next to his clinical work: “Be kind to yourself: You are doing your best, and that is enough.”

The One Thing He Will Not Sell

For a writer working in personal development, Thompson is notably unwilling to trade in easy optimism. Writing about self-talk in the closing chapter of Therapeutics Mentor Part 2, he notes that the goal is not fake positivity, but honest and supportive language that helps the child pause, think, and choose.

Read across all five books, that is the argument. The adults need a structure before the young person can use a page. The young person needs their own language, not a softened version of the adult one. And nobody involved is asked to pretend the work is finished.

About David E. Thompson

David E. Thompson is a mental health professional, therapeutic mentor, veteran track and field coach, certified personal trainer, and author with more than thirty-three years of experience working with children, adolescents, young adults, and families. His training covers Sports Administration, Personal Training, and Social and Criminal Justice. Through mentorship, coaching, youth development programs, and family support services, he works with young people on confidence, emotional awareness, resilience, and purpose.

Andrea N. Grant, CEO & Principal Consultant, Grant Consulting Group

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

Andrea N. Grant, CEO & Principal Consultant, Grant Consulting Group

By: Natalie Johnson

Growth is often viewed through three lenses: strategy, funding, or market opportunity. Regardless of the framework an organization adopts, execution repeatedly emerges as the limiting factor. As revenue increases and missions expand, internal systems struggle to keep pace. Teams become overwhelmed, decision-making slows, and operational complexity erodes momentum.

For Andrea N. Grant, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Consultant at Grant Consulting Group and a transformational Chief Operating Officer, the answer is to remove the execution bottlenecks that prevent organizations from scaling effectively. “I didn’t read this in a book. I lived it,” Grant says. “The highest performing executives weren’t always the most skilled, but they were the most trusted.”

Her perspective reflects years of leading enterprise-wide operations across HR, IT, Risk, Compliance, Facilities, and Operations, while helping organizations build the infrastructure necessary for sustainable growth. The result is an operations philosophy built on systems thinking, operational excellence, and AI implementation that enables organizations to expand their impact without exhausting their people.

Why Execution Fails at Scale

Growth exposes weaknesses that already exist beneath the surface. Leaders may communicate one set of values publicly while making decisions that contradict those principles internally. The result is more than a cultural concern. “When integrity is the foundation, everything moves faster. When it’s missing, everything costs more.” This principle extends far beyond leadership communication. Trust directly affects organizational scaling because it determines how quickly decisions move through an organization, how effectively teams collaborate, and whether people remain engaged during periods of change.

“It wasn’t just a morale problem. It was a trust collapse.” None of the usual warning signs (deliverables begin slipping, high performers quietly disengage, burnout increases) initially appear in board presentations, but they eventually emerge through declining productivity, higher turnover, absenteeism, and weaker financial performance. What appears to be a leadership issue ultimately becomes an operational one.

Building Operations That Multiply Impact

Grant believes responsible AI implementation has become one of the most practical tools for mission-driven operations. Removing operational bottlenecks requires infrastructure modernization that allows people to focus on higher-value work while routine tasks become increasingly automated.

Rather than replacing people, AI-powered workflows for nonprofits and purpose-driven organizations create leadership capacity by eliminating repetitive administrative work, improving cross-functional alignment, and strengthening decision-making through better access to information.

Organizations often hesitate because they associate AI with large technology companies or expensive transformation projects. “For organizations operating with constrained budgets, automation can become an important driver of budget optimization and headcount efficiency, allowing teams to scale revenue without burning out employees.” The transition is less about adopting new technology than moving from spreadsheets to systems that support agile operations and measurable execution.

Creating Alignment Through Operational Discipline

Technology alone, however, cannot solve organizational challenges if leadership behavior remains inconsistent. “Brand is not marketing. It’s a trust architecture.” That trust architecture becomes visible through daily operations. Values must appear inside governance structures, meeting practices, performance management, and decision-making processes.

This creates the cross-functional alignment organizations need to execute consistently across departments. Grant emphasizes three disciplines that strengthen operational performance: auditing leadership behavior before amplifying organizational messaging, operationalizing integrity through repeatable systems, and leading transparently.

“The most trusted leaders are not perfect. They’re honest, and they show their growth in real time.” Acknowledging mistakes, inviting better ideas, and demonstrating continuous learning strengthens leadership credibility rather than weakening it. As Grant notes, “Trust isn’t built in a highlight reel. It’s built in the hard moments.” These practices also reinforce risk governance by encouraging transparency before small issues become enterprise-wide problems.

The Future Belongs to Organizations That Align Trust and Technology

As organizations increasingly adopt AI and digital transformation, operational consistency will become even more important. Grant believes AI will accelerate both efficiency and accountability by making organizational misalignment easier to identify. “AI is accelerating everything, including fast misalignment that gets exposed.”

Organizations that succeed will build mission-driven operations where leadership behavior, organizational culture, operational systems, and technology reinforce one another. This combination creates agile infrastructure for growth while protecting the people responsible for delivering that growth.

For Grant, transforming operational risk into competitive advantage begins with recognizing that sustainable growth is not achieved through larger budgets or additional headcount alone. It comes from building systems that remove friction, multiply leadership capacity, and allow organizations to execute with greater clarity and confidence.

Follow Andrea N. Grant on LinkedIn or visit her website.

New York City Public Schools Ban Generative AI for 600,000 Students Through Eighth Grade

NY Weekly Staff 2 on September 2, 2026

New York City Public Schools will prohibit generative artificial intelligence tools for all students from pre-K through eighth grade starting with the 2026–2027 school year, Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Schools Chancellor Kamar Samuels announced on September 2. The one-year moratorium covers chatbots, AI tutors, and companion AI software across the nation’s largest school district, affecting roughly 600,000 children, or two-thirds of the system’s enrollment.

Key Takeaways

  • Generative AI tools, including chatbots and AI tutors, are banned for all students in pre-K through eighth grade for the 2026–2027 school year
  • Individual devices are largely prohibited in classrooms from pre-K through second grade; screen time is capped at 30 minutes for grades 3–5 and 45 minutes for middle school
  • High school students will have restricted AI access limited to AI literacy, career readiness, and five pilot programs at select schools
  • Teachers are barred from using AI for grading, behavior monitoring, counseling, or developing special education plans
  • Exceptions remain for assistive technology serving students with disabilities and English language learners, as well as for computer-based assessments, e-books, coding, and robotics
  • A new task force of teachers, elected officials, and education experts will guide implementation and produce a report by April 2027

The Policy Reverses a Months-Long Struggle Over Classroom AI Rules

The moratorium marks a sharp turn from where New York City Public Schools stood six months ago. In March 2026, Chancellor Samuels introduced a “traffic light” framework that assigned red, yellow, and green categories to different AI uses. Under that system, educators were barred from using AI for grading and discipline decisions, but student-facing AI received a “yellow light,” a designation that left classroom use largely at teacher discretion.

That approach drew immediate criticism from parents and educators who viewed it as too ambiguous for a school system serving more than 900,000 students. Thousands of parents signed a petition calling for a full moratorium on generative AI in schools. Grassroots parent groups organized testimonies at school board meetings, and by late spring, more than half of the New York City Council’s members had signed a letter urging Mayor Mamdani and Chancellor Samuels to pause AI use entirely.

Samuels acknowledged in May that the city had “missed the mark” with its initial guidance. By July, the chancellor directed all schools to freeze software purchases until new rules were finalized, a decision that created logistical challenges for principals scrambling to ensure access to electronic gradebooks and family communication platforms before the September 10 start of the school year.

Screen Time Restrictions Accompany the AI Ban

The new policy goes beyond artificial intelligence. New York City Public Schools will also restrict how much time students spend on individual devices during the school day. Classrooms serving pre-K through second grade will no longer distribute individual laptops or tablets to students, though smart boards will remain in use. For students in grades three through five, the guidelines recommend no more than 30 minutes of screen time per day on individual devices. Middle school students will have a 45-minute daily cap.

The screen time limits follow a broader national conversation about technology in classrooms. Governor Kathy Hochul implemented a statewide ban on smartphones in New York schools in 2025, a policy that reshaped how districts across the state approach personal devices during instructional hours.

Education Department officials framed the restrictions as a return to fundamentals. Internal presentation materials obtained by multiple outlets stated that younger students need hands-on learning, social interaction, play, and teacher-guided instruction, and that routine individual screen use can crowd out those experiences.

High School Students Face Narrowly Defined AI Access

Students in ninth through twelfth grade will not face a blanket ban, but their access to AI tools will be tightly controlled. The policy permits AI use only in contexts related to AI literacy and career readiness. Five pilot programs at unspecified schools will test broader classroom applications under structured conditions.

The high school guidelines acknowledge that older students will encounter AI in the workforce and in higher education. Presentation materials note that high schoolers need guided preparation for a world and economy increasingly driven by AI and new technologies, paired with instruction on how the technology works, its biases, and how to evaluate its outputs.

What Teachers Can and Cannot Do With AI

The policy draws clear lines for educators. Teachers may use approved AI tools for lesson planning, translating materials, and drafting communications with families. They may not use AI for grading student work, monitoring student behavior, providing counseling, or developing individualized education programs for students with disabilities.

The restrictions on grading and special education planning mirror the red-light prohibitions from the original March framework, suggesting that the administration viewed those guardrails as appropriate even when the broader policy was considered too permissive. The key shift is on the student-facing side, where the yellow light has been replaced with a firm prohibition for the majority of the student population.

NYC’s Decision Carries National Weight

New York City Public Schools is the largest school district in the United States, and its technology policies have historically influenced how other districts approach similar decisions. The Adams administration’s 2023 ban on ChatGPT, followed by its reversal months later, set off a wave of policy debates in school districts across the country.

Mayor Mamdani framed the new moratorium as a deliberate counter to industry pressure. In a statement released ahead of the announcement, Mamdani pushed back on what the administration views as a premature rush to integrate AI into early education. Chancellor Samuels echoed that position, stating that the Department of Education would not conflate innovation with more tech and that the city is focused on protecting the critical human connection, curiosity, and creativity that help children grow.

The city describes the moratorium as the most expansive AI restriction of its kind in the nation. A new task force composed of teachers, elected officials, subject matter experts, and union representatives will evaluate the policy’s effectiveness and produce a report by April 2027, which city officials have said will serve as the foundation for a longer-term AI framework for New York City classrooms.

FAQs

When Does the NYC School AI Ban Take Effect?

The one-year moratorium on student-facing generative AI takes effect with the 2026–2027 school year, which begins September 10, 2026. The policy applies to all students in pre-K through eighth grade across New York City Public Schools.

How Many Students Are Affected by the AI Ban?

Approximately 600,000 students, or two-thirds of the system’s total enrollment of more than 900,000, fall within the pre-K through eighth grade range covered by the moratorium. High school students are not subject to a blanket ban but face restricted access.

What AI Tools Are Banned Under the New Policy?

The policy prohibits all software that uses student-facing generative AI for students in pre-K through eighth grade. That includes chatbots, AI tutors, and companion AI software. Companion chatbots are banned across all grade levels, including high school.

Are There Any Exceptions to the AI Ban?

Assistive technology for students with disabilities and tools supporting English language learners remain permitted. Computer-based assessments that students typically complete for reading and math will continue to be administered on devices. E-books, coding assignments, and robotics programs are also exempt from the restrictions.

What Are the New Screen Time Limits for NYC Students?

Students in pre-K through second grade will no longer have access to individual devices like laptops or tablets in classrooms, though smart boards will still be used. Students in grades three through five are limited to 30 minutes of screen time on individual devices per day. Middle school students are capped at 45 minutes per day.

Can High School Students Still Use AI?

High school students will have restricted access to AI tools, limited to contexts involving AI literacy and career readiness. Five pilot programs at select schools will test broader classroom AI applications under structured conditions. The policy frames high school AI access as guided preparation for a workforce increasingly shaped by the technology.

Can Teachers Still Use AI Under the New Rules?

Teachers may use approved AI tools for lesson planning, translating materials, and drafting communications with families. They are prohibited from using AI for grading student work, monitoring student behavior, providing counseling, or developing individualized education programs for students with disabilities.

What Happens After the One-Year Moratorium Ends?

A new Technology in Schools Coalition composed of students, educators, parent leaders, elected officials, subject matter experts, and union representatives will evaluate the policy throughout the school year. The coalition is expected to produce a report by April 2027, which city officials have said will serve as the foundation for a longer-term AI framework for New York City classrooms.

Why Did New York City Reverse Its Earlier AI Policy?

The March 2026 “traffic light” framework drew sharp criticism for being too vague on student-facing AI use. Thousands of parents signed a petition calling for a full moratorium, and more than half of the City Council signed a letter urging a pause. Chancellor Samuels acknowledged in May that the city had “missed the mark” with its initial guidance, and the administration spent the summer developing the more restrictive policy announced September 2.

Is New York City the First School District to Ban AI?

New York City Public Schools describes this as the most expansive student-facing AI moratorium in the nation. The district previously banned ChatGPT in January 2023 under the Adams administration before reversing course months later. Other districts, including Los Angeles, have enacted their own restrictions on devices and AI in schools, but NYC’s policy covers the largest student population of any single district in the country.

Residential Developments Shaping Singapore’s Housing Landscape

NY Weekly Staff on September 2, 2026

Singapore’s property market continues to draw strong interest from homebuyers and long-term holders as fresh condominium projects enter the pipeline. Limited land supply, steady population needs, and ongoing infrastructure upgrades keep demand firm for well-located homes. Two projects currently in the spotlight illustrate different sides of this activity: one in a mature, green District 10 enclave and another in the growing western region. Both reflect current buyer preferences for practical layouts, reliable transport links, and settings that support family life or future rental demand.

Location Advantages That Matter Most

Prime residential pockets still command attention because they deliver privacy alongside access. In the Holland and Bukit Timah area, low-rise developments fit naturally into established landed estates. Residents gain quiet streets, mature trees, and short drives to lifestyle hubs such as Holland Village. Schools with strong reputations sit within practical distances, which remains a decisive factor for families with young children.

One such project is Amberwood at Holland. Situated along Holland Link in District 10, it sits inside the Holland Plain precinct. The site offers a low-density setting with roughly 212 units planned across low-rise blocks. Buyers gain proximity to King Albert Park MRT on the Downtown Line, with the future Cross Island Line interchange adding further reach. Nearby primary and secondary schools, including Methodist Girls’ School, sit within useful range. Everyday needs are covered by Bukit Timah Plaza and local grocery options a short distance away.

Further west, growth corridors offer a different set of strengths. The Jurong Lake District is progressing into a major employment and lifestyle node outside the traditional city center. Homes here place residents near parks, future job centers, and existing rail lines. Direct MRT access reduces commuting time and supports both owner-occupiers and tenants.

Lucerne Grand occupies a site along Lakeside Drive in District 22. Developed by City Developments Limited, the mixed-use project plans around 570 residential units plus ground-floor commercial space. It stands next to Lakeside MRT on the East-West Line, giving straightforward travel to Jurong East and the city. Jurong Lake Gardens lies close by, providing open space and recreational paths. Rulang Primary School sits within the one-kilometer band that many families prioritize, and Shuqun Primary School is close by.

These location choices address real daily needs: shorter journeys, access to education, and room to breathe. The same factors tend to matter to the next wave of buyers looking in the same area.

Practical Benefits for Different Buyer Groups

Family buyers often seek larger unit mixes. Three- to five-bedroom layouts allow space for growing households or multi-generational living. Efficient floor plans that maximize usable area without wasted corridors help stretch the budget further. Low-rise designs reduce the feeling of density and improve natural light and ventilation for many stacks.

Connectivity remains a core benefit. Homes within walking or short driving distance of MRT stations free residents from heavy car reliance. Future line interchanges multiply the value of existing stations. Expressway access adds flexibility for those who still drive.

Retail and amenities at the doorstep or a short trip away reduce friction in daily routines. Mixed-use projects that include supermarket space or dining options deliver convenience without requiring long trips. Green surroundings and parks contribute to quality of life and appeal to residents who value outdoor activity.

For investors, the combination of transport links and employment growth shapes rental demand. Professionals working in nearby business districts or future hubs look for homes that minimize travel. Established school networks also draw families willing to pay for location.

Challenges Buyers Should Weigh Carefully

New launches carry construction timelines. Many target Temporary Occupation Permit toward the end of the decade, meaning buyers wait several years before moving in. Progressive payment schemes help manage cash flow, yet buyers must plan for holding costs and interest during the build period.

Pricing in popular districts sits at elevated levels. Land costs from recent Government Land Sales set a floor that developers pass on. Buyers need to assess total cost against personal budgets and compare against resale options in the same area. Stamp duties and loan-to-value rules further shape affordability.

Market conditions can shift. Interest rates, cooling measures, and broader economic factors influence take-up rates and subsequent capital performance. Leasehold tenure of 99 years is standard for most new private projects, so buyers should understand the remaining lease at any future sale point.

Unit selection requires early attention. Popular stacks, higher floors, or preferred orientations often move first. Registration for previews and priority access helps, but demand can still outpace supply on launch weekends.

Current Trends Guiding New Projects

Several patterns stand out in the latest wave of launches. Developers favor sites with existing or planned MRT connectivity because buyers rank this highly. Low-density configurations appear more frequently in mature landed precincts where height controls and neighborhood character matter. In growth areas, mixed-use formats that combine homes with retail podium space address convenience and create additional footfall.

Unit mixes tilt toward family-sized homes. Pure studio or one-bedroom heavy projects are less common in these locations. Developers instead provide three-bedroom and larger options that suit owner-occupiers while remaining attractive to tenants seeking space.

Infrastructure timing influences site selection. Projects that open near completed or near-term MRT stations and garden parks gain an edge. The Jurong Lake District transformation and Cross Island Line works create longer-term tailwinds for western projects, while District 10 continues to benefit from its established prestige and school network.

Quality of finishes and practical design also receive attention. Buyers expect functional storage, sensible kitchen layouts, and outdoor areas that work in Singapore’s climate. Developers with established track records use that reputation to build confidence during the pre-launch period.

Making Sense of the Opportunity

The current pipeline gives buyers concrete choices rather than abstract promises. Projects such as Amberwood at Holland and Lucerne Grand show how location, unit mix, and timing come together. One offers low-rise living inside a quiet, school-rich enclave. The other places residents beside an MRT station and a national garden inside a district undergoing major change.

Prospective buyers benefit from reviewing official materials early, calculating total holding costs, and visiting showflats once open. Understanding the surrounding infrastructure schedule and school distances helps match a project to personal circumstances. Market data on recent transactions in the same district provides useful context for pricing discussions.

Careful selection matters in Singapore’s residential market. Homes in areas with genuine transport, education, and lifestyle strengths tend to hold interest over time. The projects now preparing for launch let buyers choose among locations that already demonstrate these strengths.

Matching a Project to Personal Priorities

New condominium projects continue to shape how Singaporeans live and invest. The focus on practical connectivity, family-oriented layouts, and neighborhood character reflects what buyers actually need. Whether the preference leans toward a mature green precinct or a lakeside growth corridor, the key lies in matching the specific site strengths to personal priorities and timelines. Reviewing the available details, visiting when possible, and weighing the full cost of ownership all form part of that process. Clear information and realistic planning remain the most reliable guides for any purchase decision.

Menu

Explore New York Weekly™

Legal & Support

  • Get published in New York Weekly™

Founders, executives, and brands ready to build credibility through publication.

Get Published

Follow Us

Facebook Instagram Linkedin

New York Weekly™ is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Copyright ©2026 Matrix Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Use of any part of this site implies acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The content on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached, or used in any way without the prior written permission of New York Weekly.

Explore New York Weekly™

Legal

Explore New York Weekly

Legal

A Matrix Global Publication

New York Weekly™ is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Copyright ©2025 Matrix Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.