Mamdani Picks Hunts Point as Second Site for City-Run Grocery Stores, First to Open in 2027

Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani and the New York City Economic Development Corporation announced on Monday, May 18, that The Peninsula in Hunts Point will host the second site under the city’s municipal grocery store program — and the first one expected to open its doors, by the end of 2027. The 20,000-square-foot store will anchor one of the most ambitious public-sector retail experiments in modern American urban policy, planting a publicly owned supermarket directly in the South Bronx neighborhood that hosts one of the largest food distribution centers in the world.

The announcement, made at The Peninsula site itself, came just six days after Mamdani released his $124.7 billion Fiscal Year 2027 Executive Budget — a fiscal blueprint built around an affordability-first agenda. The grocery store program sits at the center of that pitch, framed by City Hall as a structural response to grocery prices in a city where 77 percent of households in neighborhoods around Hunts Point struggle to afford basic necessities, according to United Way’s True Cost of Living data cited in the city’s press release.

How the Hunts Point Store Fits Into the Broader Plan

The Peninsula is an NYCEDC project, currently transforming the former Spofford Juvenile Detention Facility into a mixed-use campus that will eventually include 740 units of 100% affordable housing, more than 50,000 square feet of public open space, 30,000 square feet of light industrial space, and another 50,000-plus square feet of community facility space. The grocery store will occupy the campus’s 20,000 square feet of commercial space.

Last month, the administration named La Marqueta in East Harlem as the first site selected under the program. Hunts Point, announced Monday, will be the second site — but the first to open, with NYCEDC Interim President and CEO Jeanny Pak confirming the Bronx will be the first borough where a NYC Groceries store operates by end of 2027.

The total program carries $70 million in capital funding from City Hall, with the Mamdani administration committing to one municipal grocery store in each of the five boroughs by the end of the mayor’s first term in 2029.

Deputy Mayor for Economic Justice Julie Su said the city will issue a request for proposals this summer to select operators that meet the administration’s affordability standards. The model is hybrid: the city owns the land, covers construction and fit-out costs, and contracts with a third-party private operator to handle day-to-day operations under city-set requirements for pricing, labor standards, and reporting.

Alongside the Hunts Point announcement, NYCEDC launched the NYC Groceries Sites Portal, an open submission tool inviting private property owners in Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island to nominate potential locations. Eligible sites must include at least 10,000 square feet of retail space and be available on a timeline that supports an opening by 2029.

A Bold Experiment in Public-Sector Retail

Mamdani Picks Hunts Point as Second Site for City-Run Grocery Stores, First to Open in 2027

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

Municipal grocery stores remain unusual in the United States, and a program at this scale, in the country’s largest city, has no real modern analog. Mamdani has previously described the initiative as a “grand experiment” — and the rollout is being structured as one. The city is treating affordable groceries the way past administrations treated public power and affordable broadband: as an essential public service that markets, left alone, have not delivered evenly across all five boroughs.

What makes Hunts Point an especially loaded choice is its proximity to the Hunts Point Food Distribution Center, one of the largest wholesale food markets on the planet. The neighborhood sits adjacent to some of the freshest produce, fish, and meat moving through the East Coast supply chain, yet local households frequently travel out of the borough to access affordable, fresh groceries — a logistical irony Mamdani highlighted directly in his Monday remarks.

The site itself carries weight. The Peninsula is rising on land that once held the Spofford Juvenile Detention Facility, an institution closed in 2011 after years of documented abuses. Bronx Borough President Vanessa Gibson called the redevelopment a transformation of “a site once associated with pain and trauma and mass incarceration into a place that is rooted in community, in healing, in building, in opportunity.”

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whose district covers Hunts Point, framed the announcement as a matter of geographic equity: “Access to affordable, fresh food should not be a luxury determined by zip code; it should be a right.” State Senator Jose Serrano, who represents the 29th Senate District, called the site selection important for communities that battle food insecurity.

What the Industry Should Watch

For the private grocery sector — operating in a New York City market estimated by industry analysts at over $50 billion annually — the program raises questions the RFP process will start answering this summer. Among them: how city-set pricing standards will be calibrated against wholesale costs, what wage and benefit floors operators will be required to meet, what reporting transparency the city will demand, and whether the financial model can sustain margins thin enough to deliver Mamdani’s promised cheaper bread, eggs, and staples.

Commercial real estate brokers will also be watching closely. The 10,000-square-foot minimum retail-space requirement and 2029 opening deadline in the portal criteria signal NYCEDC is moving fast on Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island site selection. Property owners with available footprints in underserved neighborhoods now have an open lane to participate in a program backed by $70 million in city capital.

Developers behind The Peninsula — Gilbane Development, The Hudson Companies, MHANY Management Inc., and Broadway Builders — have positioned the project as a model for integrating grocery access into affordable housing developments rather than treating retail as an afterthought. Gilbane CEO James Patchett, who previously led NYCEDC, said a neighborhood grocery store was “central to our vision from day one.”

The Wider Stakes

The Hunts Point announcement is the first tangible deliverable on one of Mamdani’s signature campaign promises, arriving fast enough that it lands during the same budget cycle in which his administration is asking Albany and the City Council to back new revenue tools like a pied-à-terre tax on non-resident-owned second homes worth more than $5 million.

The municipal grocery program is small in dollar terms compared to the broader $124.7 billion city budget, but its symbolic weight is large. If the Hunts Point store opens on time in 2027 and delivers measurable price relief, it gives the administration a tangible argument for the rest of its affordability agenda. If it stalls, falters at the operator-selection stage, or struggles to compete on price with the private grocers already operating nearby, critics will have a clear data point to challenge the model.

For now, the RFP is the next move to watch. It drops this summer. The store is scheduled to open its doors by end of 2027.

How Great Contractors Think Before a Project Begins

By: Umair Malik

Before any dirt is dug up or materials are ordered, great contractors are already deep into strategic thinking and planning. What determines a smooth, efficient build rather than a chaotic, disorganized one often comes down to the quality of the decisions being made long before any construction begins. Having a strong pre-project mindset is about more than just logistics, it’s about foresight, risk management, and coordination.

They Start with the End in Mind

Top contractors don’t just take the blueprints from the architect and jump right into building. They analyze the plans for constructability and visualize the completed project in detail, considering:

• How the space will function day-to-day

• Potential challenges during construction

• Long-term durability and maintenance

• Client expectations versus practical realities

By working through these details, contractors can identify issues early and reduce costly changes later on.

They Meticulously Plan Pre-Construction Details

Great contractors treat the pre-construction phase as the foundation of success, making sure to include:

• Budget development and cost forecasting

• Site analysis and feasibility studies

• Permitting requirements and timelines

• Coordination with architects, engineers, subcontractors, and other stakeholders

Rather than rushing to start building, they invest time in figuring out these details, with the understanding that every hour spent planning can save days, or even weeks, over the life of the project.

They Think About Systems, Not Just Tasks

Average contractors may focus on individual steps, but great contractors think in systems because they understand that each decision impacts the project as a whole. For example:

• Changing a material during construction may affect the structural load, delivery timelines, and labor costs

• Adjusting layouts after building has begun can influence electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems

• Scheduling one trade has an impact on subsequent ones

Thinking in systems rather than individual tasks leads to better overall coordination and fewer surprises and delays.

They Anticipate Problems Before They Happen

Experience allows great contractors to recognize potential issues before they occur, often prior to clients or even designers being aware of them. They ask questions like:

• Will weather conditions affect certain phases?

• Are there supply chain uncertainties for important materials?

• Could site conditions create unexpected complications?

By proactively addressing any concerns, they can help prevent delays and budget overruns.

They Prioritize Early Communication

Strong communication is central to what makes a contractor great, and it’s something they build into the process from the very beginning. By establishing clear expectations with clients, defining roles for all team members, and using consistent reporting and update systems, contractors create alignment and alleviate confusion once the project is underway.

Planning that Sets the Tone for Everything That Follows

The early thinking and planning phase shapes every aspect of a construction project and is what sets the foundation for a successful build. Contractors who take the time to plan thoroughly, analyze deeply, and communicate clearly are far more likely to deliver projects on time and within budget.

For property owners and developers, understanding how contractors approach the initial stages of a project can make a significant difference when it comes to selecting the right partner. Those who prioritize thoughtful pre-construction processes tend to deliver better builds and better overall experiences.

What Converters Should Know About Rotary Die Quality

By: Umair Malik

Rotary die quality directly shapes the success of converting businesses. While it can be easy to focus solely on the cost or turnaround time, the quality of the die itself has a direct impact on performance, efficiency, and the consistency of your final product. Understanding what characterizes a high-quality rotary die can help converters make more informed decisions and avoid costly production issues.

Key Features of High-Quality Rotary Dies

Not all rotary dies are created equal. Although it may be tempting to use lower-cost dies, the effects of poor-quality tooling can often lead to greater expense and hassle in the long run. High-quality dies, by contrast, are designed with precision and durability in mind, ensuring that they will perform consistently under demanding conditions. Well-designed and manufactured dies are made with:

• High-grade materials that resist wear and deformation

• Smooth surface finishes to reduce friction

• Tight tolerances for accurate and repeatable cuts

• Balanced construction for stable operation

All of these features work together to deliver reliable performance across a wide range of applications.

The Impact on Production Efficiency

Poor die quality can cause a variety of problems, including inconsistent cuts, increased material waste, and frequent machine disruptions. Over time, these issues can significantly reduce productivity. High-quality rotary dies help improve efficiency by:

• Reducing time spent on setup, adjustments, and maintenance

• Minimizing material waste

• Increasing throughput

• Maintaining consistent output quality

• Extending tool life and decreasing replacement frequency

For converters, these benefits translate into smoother, more effective operations and lower overall costs.

Why Material Selection Matters

The type of materials used in rotary die manufacturing has a major influence on their performance and longevity. Inferior materials may wear down more quickly, resulting in substandard cutting performance and increased maintenance requirements. Quality rotary dies are typically produced using:

• Hardened steels for durability

• Advanced coatings for wear resistance

• Construction designed to handle specific materials

Choosing the right material ensures that the die can handle the demands of the application without compromising performance.

Evaluating Die Manufacturers and Capabilities

Converters should carefully evaluate die manufacturers to guarantee they are receiving high-quality products. Factors to consider include:

• Manufacturing processes

• Quality control standards

• Experience with specific industries or applications

• Ability to provide custom solutions

• Support for training, maintenance, and troubleshooting solutions

Finding a die manufacturer who emphasizes strong processes and support, in addition to utilizing high-quality materials, can make all the difference. Having access to detailed product specifications and technical resources can also help converters better understand the capabilities of their tooling.

Making Informed Tooling Decisions

Selecting the right rotary die is more than a single purchasing decision. It is a strategic investment in the efficiency of your production and the quality of your product. Converters who prioritize die quality often achieve higher levels of customer satisfaction while setting themselves up for fewer operational disruptions and improved consistency across production runs. By focusing on precision, quality materials, and manufacturing expertise, converters can make sure their tooling supports their long-term success.

A Safe Space for Students to Feel Scared

By Edward DuCoin, Co-Founder of Orpical Technology Solutions & Professor at Montclair State University.

One of my students wrote me this at the end of last semester:
“You created a safe space for me to feel scared without judgment.”

It reads as a contradiction the first time through. A safe space in which you feel scared? But that phrase captures something the contemporary conversation about psychological safety, in classrooms and beyond, has nearly lost.

Amy Edmondson, who introduced the concept of psychological safety into organizational scholarship more than two decades ago, has spent recent years pushing back against how her term has been popularized. She never defined psychological safety as the absence of discomfort. She defined it as the shared belief that one can take an interpersonal risk; speak up, disagree, admit a mistake, without being humiliated. Discomfort and safety, in her framing, are not opposites. They are conditions that must coexist for learning to occur.

The popular conversation has flattened that idea in two opposite directions, and both are wrong.

One version, well-intentioned but often imported from human resources guidance, has reduced psychological safety to “do not make anyone uncomfortable.” Validate. Do not push. Do not put students on the spot. Anything that creates tension is presumed to harm. The underlying model is therapeutic.

The other version, usually voiced by leaders who pride themselves on candor, has rejected psychological safety as coddling. Hard feedback is good for you. Discomfort is the price of growth. If you cannot take it, you do not belong. The underlying model is pressure-testing.

In higher education, we have a version of this argument running on our own ground, in the long debate over trigger warnings, safe spaces, and the temperature of classroom discourse. The argument is usually staged as a choice: protect students or challenge them. What the staging misses is that the most useful classrooms do both at once.

I teach undergraduate business classes at Montclair State University. Every semester, in their final reflections, students tell me what about the course shaped them, especially being called on, speaking up when they weren’t sure, and receiving feedback that initially stung. The pattern across many semesters is what the public discourse keeps missing.

Students do not grow in comfort. If nothing is at stake, if a student is never asked to take a risk, if they can coast through a semester without ever being called on, they preserve the version of themselves they walked in with. A class in which no one is ever uncomfortable is a class in which no one learns.

But students do not grow under pressure alone, either. Discomfort without safety does not produce growth. It produces compliance, mediocrity, and quiet withdrawal. Students who fear being mocked do not speak. They get smaller. They learn to predict what the instructor wants and offer it back, which is the opposite of intellectual courage.

What produces growth is the combination of discomfort and the credible signal that taking a shot and missing will not be punished. A student can speak and be wrong, and the cost of being wrong is bounded. They can ask the question that exposes them. My student described a safe space to feel scared because both conditions were present at once. Scared, because something was at stake. Safe, because the consequence of failing was not humiliation.

A “safe” classroom, by that definition, is not one in which no one is ever uncomfortable. It is one in which students are willing to be uncomfortable because they trust the discomfort will not be used against them. They speak in class because they have seen their peers speak without being punished. They disagree with the instructor because they have seen the instructor change their mind. They flag confusion because the class has met confusion with engagement rather than impatience.

The students who improved the most in my classes were not the ones I made comfortable. They were the ones who told me, in their reflections, that they had been afraid of being wrong and chose to speak anyway. One student wrote that she had spoken up and “ended up being wrong” many times across the semester, but had continued because she wanted to understand the material we were working through. Same fear other students felt; different response. What changed the response was not lower stakes; it was the sense that being wrong out loud does not result in humiliation and, in fact, results in admiration.

Photo Courtesy: Edward DuCoin

What It Requires From the Instructor

The hard part of safe discomfort, for anyone running a classroom, is that both halves must happen at once, and the two halves are in tension.

You must push. You must call on students who have not volunteered. You must give specific, direct feedback, the kind that does not emerge in a session designed to keep everyone comfortable. You must make it costly to coast. Without the push, safety becomes irrelevant because there is no risk to protect.

But you also must be the kind of instructor whose disapproval does not crush. That is the harder and less teachable half. You must be visibly fair. You must have a track record of not punishing students for being wrong. You must praise the risk, not only the right answer. When a student says something foolish, you cannot roll your eyes. When a student disagrees with you in front of the class, take this as a wonderful opportunity to show them that, as a teacher, you are consistently seeking new ideas. The other students are reading every signal and deciding whether the risk is, in fact, bounded.

An instructor who is good at only one half produces one of the two broken classrooms. All pushing yields a roomful of performers who say what they think the instructor wants to hear. All safety yields a roomful of students who never push themselves. The combination is harder and rarer than either piece, and it cannot be faked.

At the institutional level, higher education has drifted toward one pole or the other. Some campuses, under genuine pressure from concerns about student mental health, have absorbed the message that discomfort is a kind of harm. Others, in reaction, have absorbed the message that any accommodation of student vulnerability is academic decline. Both readings turn psychological safety into a slogan, and both produce classrooms worse than they need to be.

The middle is not a compromise between the poles. It is a different practice. It demands that we be more rigorous than the comfort school will allow and more humane than the candor school will admit. It demands that we push and be trustworthy at the same time.

It is, in short, a safe space to feel scared, which is exactly what my student named.

The conversation about psychological safety, on our campuses and elsewhere, would be more useful if it stopped treating safety as the absence of fear and started treating it as the presence of trust. Fear, in the right amount, is the engine of growth. Trust is what makes the fear survivable.

Edmondson named the condition. My student named the experience. Those of us in classrooms could stand to take both more seriously.

Edward DuCoin teaches business at Montclair State University and is co-founder of Orpical Technology Solutions. You can connect with him on LinkedIn.

Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Disc and Nerve Pain

By: Dr. Bruce Mark, DC | Hollywood Laser Pain Center | Hollywood, Florida

Non-surgical Class IV laser therapy and spinal decompression are drug-free options often considered for patients with herniated discs, sciatica, degenerative disc disease, and chronic nerve pain. These treatments are typically described as non-invasive and outpatient in nature, in contrast to spinal fusion, which generally requires 6 to 12 weeks of restricted movement followed by months of physical therapy.

Conservative disc care is generally considered most relevant before spinal fusion is performed. After fusion, the formation of scar tissue can limit the range of non-surgical approaches available. For patients weighing their options, evaluating conservative care before any irreversible procedure is often part of a thorough decision-making process.

At Hollywood Laser Pain Center on Polk Street in Hollywood, Florida, I have worked with disc and nerve pain patients across Broward County for more than 27 years. Many of those patients arrived without having been introduced to the range of conservative options that are designed to address tissue-level factors in disc and nerve pain.

What Does a Herniated Disc Actually Do to the Body?

The intervertebral disc is composed of a tough outer ring, the annulus fibrosus, and a gel-like inner core called the nucleus pulposus. When the annulus weakens or cracks under repetitive stress or sudden load, the nucleus pushes through, compressing adjacent nerve roots. The result is the radiating pain, numbness, and weakness that disc patients describe as the most disruptive pain they have ever experienced.

According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, lumbar disc herniations are among the most common causes of low back and leg pain, with an estimated 5 to 20 cases per 1,000 adults annually. The L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels account for the vast majority of clinically significant lumbar herniations. Cervical herniations at C5-C6 and C6-C7 produce the arm pain, hand tingling, and grip weakness that are frequently misattributed to shoulder or elbow conditions.

A 2018 review in the Journal of Pain Research found that leaked nucleus pulposus material triggers a significant immune-mediated inflammatory response that amplifies nerve pain independently of mechanical compression, which is one reason rest and anti-inflammatory medications alone often produce only limited relief.

Why Are So Many Disc Patients in Hollywood Still in Pain?

The standard medical response to disc herniation (NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, physical therapy, and epidural steroid injections) addresses certain aspects of the clinical picture but does not always address all of them. A 2014 Cochrane Review found that epidural corticosteroid injections provided only modest, short-term relief for radiculopathy, with no significant benefit at 12 months.

Strengthening exercises cannot decompress a nerve root that is mechanically compressed by herniated disc material, and medications can suppress pain signals without changing the underlying disc anatomy. For many patients in Broward County who have cycled through the standard sequence without lasting resolution, structurally focused approaches are one of the options worth considering.

What Is Class IV Laser Therapy and How Does It Work at the Tissue Level?

Class IV laser therapy is an FDA-cleared treatment that uses medical-grade near-infrared laser energy. The technology is designed to deliver light energy into deeper tissue layers, including disc, nerve root, and paraspinal musculature, at depths that surface-level modalities are not designed to reach. At Hollywood Laser Pain Center, we use this technology as part of our overall approach to disc and nerve pain care.

The therapy works through photobiomodulation, a biological process in which cellular mitochondria absorb light energy and activate the body’s natural healing cascade. This process is associated with increased ATP production, reduced inflammatory cytokines, and accelerated tissue repair. A 2017 systematic review in Lasers in Medical Science confirmed that photobiomodulation produces measurable reductions in inflammatory cytokines, increases in cellular ATP production, and accelerated tissue repair in musculoskeletal conditions. The treatment itself is non-invasive. It does not involve injections or incisions, and patients typically describe only a mild warming sensation during sessions.

What Does Graston Technique Add to Disc and Nerve Pain Care?

Graston Technique (instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization) is a clinical tool used in our practice to address paraspinal and gluteal muscular restrictions that often develop in response to disc-related pain. When a disc herniates and creates nerve compression, the surrounding musculature responds protectively: tightening, guarding, and developing areas of fascial adhesion that, if untreated, maintain the mechanical compression on the affected segment long after the initial injury.

When applied as part of a broader care plan, Graston Technique is designed to release these soft tissue restrictions and help reduce secondary compressive loading on the affected segment. This addresses a dimension of disc care that laser therapy on its own is not designed to reach.

What Does the Research Say About Non-Surgical Disc Care Outcomes?

A study published in the Journal of Physical Therapy Science found that patients receiving spinal decompression therapy showed significant improvements in pain scores and functional disability compared to controls. Research in Photomedicine and Laser Surgery has documented improvements in nerve conduction and pain reduction in patients receiving Class IV laser therapy for nerve-related pain conditions.

For patients who have not responded to conventional conservative care, and who are facing a recommendation for surgery, these published findings represent one additional pathway worth discussing with a qualified provider before any irreversible procedure is scheduled.

What Patients Should Know Before Spinal Surgery

Back surgery is irreversible. The North American Spine Society estimates that failed back surgery syndrome affects 10 to 40 percent of spinal surgery patients, producing persistent or recurrent pain that is often more complex to treat than the original condition.

Non-surgical approaches do not carry the risks specific to spinal surgery, and they tend to remain most useful before fusion has occurred. After fusion, scar tissue formation can narrow the range of conservative interventions available.

Hollywood Laser Pain Center serves patients across Hollywood, Hallandale Beach, Pembroke Pines, Miramar, Dania Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Aventura. Every patient receives an individualized evaluation.

Visit reliefnowlaser.com/providers/hollywood/ to learn more. Watch patient education at youtube.com/@ReliefNowNation. Contact Hollywood Laser Pain Center at 2607 Polk Street, Hollywood FL 33020 | 954-925-7333.

About the Author

Dr. Bruce Mark, DC | Hollywood Laser Pain Center | 2607 Polk Street, Hollywood FL 33020 | 954-925-7333

Dr. Mark earned his Doctor of Chiropractic from Logan College of Chiropractic with honors and has practiced for more than 27 years in Hollywood, Florida. He holds certifications in Graston Technique and acupuncture and is a former collegiate football player at Wake Forest University. He practices at Broward Medical and Rehab and has served the Hollywood community for over 20 years. He is a provider in the national ReliefNow® network.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice. Effectiveness of treatments may vary depending on individual circumstances. Consult a qualified healthcare professional to discuss your specific medical needs and treatment options.