News

Confronting Big Tech and Protecting Free Speech: Trump’s Vision for Reform

NY Weekly Staff

September 18, 2024
6:12 pm

A central part of Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign agenda is his plan to confront Big Tech and protect free speech. Trump has been vocal about his belief that tech companies, particularly social media giants like Facebook (now Meta), Twitter (now X), and Google, wield too much power over public discourse and have been systematically censoring conservative voices. His plan includes a multifaceted approach to rein in Big Tech, promote free speech, and restore what he perceives as fairness in how digital platforms are regulated and operate.

Trump’s grievances with Big Tech took center stage during his first term and escalated significantly following his removal from social media platforms after the events of January 6, 2021. In response, Trump has made reforming Big Tech a key part of his platform, positioning himself as a champion for free speech rights and calling for more regulation and oversight of how these companies operate. His agenda includes reforming Section 230, which shields tech companies from liability for the content published by their users, and breaking up tech monopolies that dominate online platforms.

The Rise of Big Tech and the Free Speech Debate

In recent years, major tech companies have come under increased scrutiny for their role in moderating content on their platforms. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube have developed sophisticated systems for managing user content, which often involve moderating posts to remove hate speech, misinformation, and harmful content. While these efforts are intended to make online spaces safer and more reliable, critics argue that these companies are using their power to censor speech based on political biases.

Trump has long been an outspoken critic of these companies, accusing them of systematically silencing conservative voices and promoting left-leaning viewpoints. He argues that Big Tech companies act as gatekeepers of information, determining what news stories and opinions reach the public and which are suppressed. Trump contends that this concentration of power not only limits the free exchange of ideas but also poses a significant threat to democracy by shaping public opinion in a way that is biased against conservative values.

Reining in Big Tech: Reforming Section 230

At the heart of Trump’s plan to confront Big Tech is his proposal to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 provides legal immunity to tech companies for content posted by their users, essentially shielding them from liability for what is said on their platforms. This law, passed in 1996, was originally intended to foster the growth of the internet by allowing platforms to host user-generated content without fear of lawsuits. However, Trump and many of his supporters argue that Section 230 has allowed Big Tech companies to act with impunity, enabling them to moderate content according to their own political biases without facing any consequences.

Trump’s 2024 agenda calls for repealing or reforming Section 230 to ensure that tech companies can no longer hide behind this immunity while actively shaping political discourse through their moderation policies. By removing these protections, Trump argues, tech companies will be forced to operate as neutral platforms, giving all voices equal opportunity to be heard without censorship. This reform, he contends, would hold companies accountable for their actions and restore fairness in how online content is managed.

Breaking Up Tech Monopolies

Another major part of Trump’s plan to confront Big Tech is to break up monopolies that dominate the online landscape. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Meta have become incredibly powerful, controlling vast amounts of user data, online advertising, and digital content distribution. Critics argue that these companies have created monopolistic environments that stifle competition, limit innovation, and give them too much influence over critical parts of the economy and public life.

Trump’s agenda calls for aggressive antitrust action against these companies, advocating for breaking up monopolies to promote a more competitive market. His administration would direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to pursue antitrust investigations aimed at dismantling the concentration of power that these companies have amassed. Trump has argued that breaking up Big Tech is essential to restoring economic competition and ensuring that no single company has the ability to control vast swaths of the internet or dictate public discourse.

Promoting Free Speech on Social Media

Protecting free speech, particularly online, has become a rallying cry for Trump and his supporters. In his view, the censorship of conservative voices on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube represents an existential threat to the principle of free expression. In response, Trump’s 2024 agenda includes measures to ensure that social media platforms operate as public forums where all viewpoints are welcomed and protected.

Trump has suggested that social media companies should be treated as public utilities, subject to stricter government regulation to ensure that they cannot arbitrarily ban or censor users based on their political views. This approach would require platforms to adhere to neutral content moderation policies, ensuring that no political ideology is favored over another.

Moreover, Trump advocates for the creation of an independent oversight body that would monitor how social media companies enforce their content policies. This body would ensure that moderation decisions are made fairly and consistently, without undue bias or favoritism. Such oversight could involve third-party audits of platform algorithms and moderation practices to determine whether certain viewpoints are being disproportionately suppressed.

Legal Battles with Big Tech: Trump’s Lawsuits

In 2021, Trump filed lawsuits against Facebook, Twitter, and Google, accusing them of violating his First Amendment rights by censoring his accounts. Although private companies are not bound by the First Amendment in the same way as government entities, Trump’s lawsuits argue that these companies have become so powerful that they effectively serve as public squares where political speech must be protected. While the legal arguments behind these cases are complex and have faced challenges in court, they reflect Trump’s broader belief that tech companies should be subject to greater scrutiny and accountability when it comes to how they handle speech.

If re-elected in 2024, Trump’s agenda would likely include further legal challenges to Big Tech’s content moderation practices, pushing for courts to recognize the outsized role that these platforms play in shaping public discourse and seeking greater protections for users who feel they have been unfairly silenced.

Support for Alternative Platforms

As part of his strategy to confront Big Tech, Trump has also shown strong support for the creation of alternative social media platforms that promote free speech and operate independently of the major tech giants. After being banned from Twitter and Facebook, Trump helped launch Truth Social, a platform that positions itself as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media. Truth Social, and other platforms like Parler and Rumble, have sought to capitalize on the frustrations of conservatives who feel that their voices are being censored on traditional platforms.

Trump’s 2024 agenda is likely to continue promoting the growth of these alternative platforms, encouraging more Americans to join spaces where free expression is protected and where the moderation policies of Big Tech companies do not apply. He sees these platforms as essential to providing a counterbalance to the influence of mainstream social media, ensuring that all Americans have a place to engage in political discourse without fear of being silenced.

Challenges and Criticisms

Trump’s efforts to confront Big Tech and protect free speech have sparked considerable debate, with critics arguing that his proposals could have unintended consequences. For instance, removing Section 230 protections could make it harder for smaller platforms to operate, as they would face increased legal liability for user-generated content. Critics also argue that Trump’s push to regulate social media companies as public utilities would represent an overreach of government power, potentially infringing on the rights of private businesses to operate independently.

Additionally, the push to break up Big Tech monopolies faces legal and political hurdles. Antitrust actions are complex and time-consuming, and previous attempts to break up large corporations—such as the Microsoft antitrust case in the 1990s—have shown that success is far from guaranteed.

Conclusion: A Plan to Rein in Big Tech and Restore Free Speech

Donald Trump’s 2024 agenda to confront Big Tech and protect free speech reflects his belief that the major tech companies have amassed too much power and have abused that power to suppress political viewpoints, particularly those of conservatives. His plan to reform Section 230, break up tech monopolies, and ensure that social media platforms respect free speech would mark a significant shift in how the U.S. government approaches the regulation of Big Tech.

While challenges remain, Trump’s vision for confronting Big Tech aligns with a growing movement in both the U.S. and abroad to address the role that major technology companies play in shaping public discourse, controlling information, and influencing elections. Whether his proposals can gain traction will depend on political dynamics, legal challenges, and public opinion, but it is clear that Trump intends to make Big Tech reform a central issue in the 2024 election and beyond.

(focused on agenda 21)

Dr. Sarah Sun Liew for U.S Senate show and today’s America and world new show
Connect with Dr. Sarah Sun Liew
Direct: (424) 343 7025

Tel: (424) 777 6461

Websites: www.sarahsenator.org, info@drsarahliewforcongress.com