How Did COVID-19 Impact and Change Higher Education Procurement
Photo: Unsplash.com

How Did COVID-19 Impact and Change Higher Education Procurement?

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically impacted all sectors, and higher education was no exception. Universities and colleges worldwide faced unprecedented challenges as they scrambled to adapt to remote learning, maintain continuity in research and operations, and safeguard their communities. A key area where the pandemic’s effects were especially pronounced was in procurement—the acquisition of goods, services, and technologies necessary for the functioning of higher education institutions. Since the pandemic, procurement in higher education has faced numerous challenges that have reshaped both short-term responses and long-term strategies.

This article explores the major procurement challenges higher education institutions have encountered since COVID-19, including supply chain disruptions, the accelerated demand for technology, financial constraints, sustainability concerns, and shifting institutional priorities.

1. Supply Chain Disruptions

The global supply chain faced enormous disruptions during the pandemic, and higher education institutions struggled to procure critical supplies. From personal protective equipment (PPE) to technology for online learning, the sudden and unpredictable shortages strained procurement departments.

At the onset of the pandemic, universities and colleges urgently needed PPE to protect staff and students, especially in health and medical schools where in-person training was still required. However, demand for these items soared globally, leading to price hikes, delays, and difficulty securing adequate supplies. Similarly, institutions needed to purchase sanitization supplies and health screening equipment, which also faced shortages.

Beyond health-related goods, the disruption of global supply chains made it difficult to procure a wide range of other products essential to campus operations, including scientific equipment, furniture, and building materials. Shipping delays and manufacturing slowdowns led to unpredictable lead times, forcing procurement teams to develop new contingency plans and diversify suppliers.

This global supply chain instability underscored the need for universities to rethink procurement strategies, focusing on local sourcing, stockpiling critical items, and fostering partnerships with more flexible suppliers. In a post-COVID environment, higher education institutions continue to contend with supply chain unpredictability, compounded by new challenges such as inflation and geopolitical instability.

2. Increased Demand for Technology and Digital Tools

The most significant shift for higher education institutions during the pandemic was the move to online learning. This sudden transition placed enormous pressure on procurement teams to quickly secure digital tools, hardware, and software to facilitate remote education.

The demand for laptops, tablets, and other devices surged as both faculty and students required them for virtual instruction and learning. Many institutions found themselves competing for these devices amid a global shortage, particularly as K-12 schools and businesses also sought to procure the same technology. This scarcity drove up costs and resulted in delays, making it difficult for institutions to meet the needs of students, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

In addition to hardware, universities needed to invest in software solutions to support online education. Procurement teams had to evaluate and secure learning management systems (LMS), video conferencing platforms, online assessment tools, and digital resource libraries, all within tight timeframes. The sudden shift to remote learning also required upgrading network infrastructure and cybersecurity systems to handle increased online traffic and protect sensitive data.

These technological procurement challenges have had long-lasting effects. Even as institutions returned to in-person learning, many have adopted hybrid models, requiring ongoing investment in technology. Procurement departments must now balance the need to support both physical and digital infrastructure, ensuring that students and faculty have the necessary tools to succeed in blended learning environments.

3. Financial Constraints and Budget Cuts

COVID-19 created severe financial pressures for higher education institutions. With campuses closed, auxiliary revenue streams such as housing, dining, and athletic events evaporated. Additionally, many institutions faced declines in enrollment, particularly from international students, which further exacerbated financial challenges.

These budgetary constraints forced universities to make difficult decisions regarding procurement. Procurement teams were tasked with securing the necessary goods and services while operating under tighter financial restrictions. In many cases, this meant prioritizing essential items, deferring capital expenditures, and renegotiating contracts with suppliers to secure better terms or delay payments.

Moreover, procurement departments had to find ways to reduce costs without compromising quality. For example, many institutions turned to cooperative purchasing agreements—joining forces with other universities or public entities to leverage buying power and secure discounts on common goods. However, even with such strategies, balancing immediate needs with long-term financial sustainability has remained a significant challenge for higher education procurement teams.

4. Sustainability and Ethical Procurement

Sustainability has been a growing priority for higher education institutions, and the pandemic further complicated the pursuit of sustainable procurement practices. As institutions scrambled to address immediate needs during COVID-19, such as PPE and sanitization products, some of their sustainability goals were deprioritized. For instance, the widespread use of disposable masks, gloves, and cleaning supplies increased waste, while the urgency of securing necessary goods made it difficult to prioritize environmentally friendly options.

However, the pandemic also brought renewed attention to the importance of resilience and sustainability in procurement. Many institutions are now reassessing their procurement policies to align more closely with sustainability goals. This includes reducing reliance on single-use items, sourcing from environmentally conscious suppliers, and incorporating sustainability criteria into procurement decisions.

Additionally, ethical procurement practices have gained traction in response to the social justice movements that emerged during the pandemic. Institutions are increasingly prioritizing suppliers that align with their values around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This means working with minority-owned businesses, ensuring fair labor practices, and sourcing goods that are produced ethically.

5. Changing Priorities and Strategic Procurement

The pandemic forced higher education institutions to reassess their long-term priorities, and procurement strategies had to adapt accordingly. Many universities are now focusing more on resilience, flexibility, and risk management in procurement to ensure they are better prepared for future disruptions.

One significant shift has been toward strategic procurement, where institutions focus on developing long-term relationships with suppliers and vendors rather than engaging in transactional, one-off purchases. Strategic partnerships allow universities to negotiate better terms, ensure priority access to critical supplies, and work collaboratively on innovation and problem-solving. For instance, during the pandemic, some institutions partnered with technology companies to co-develop digital learning solutions tailored to their specific needs. Others turned to group purchasing organizations (gpos), to capitalize on purchasing power with education gpo contracts.

Additionally, procurement teams have taken on a more strategic role within higher education institutions, participating in discussions about institutional priorities and long-term planning. Rather than simply reacting to procurement needs, teams are now more involved in forecasting future trends, managing risks, and ensuring procurement aligns with the institution’s broader mission.

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted procurement in higher education, creating challenges that required institutions to adapt quickly and strategically. Supply chain disruptions, increased demand for technology, financial constraints, sustainability concerns, and shifting priorities have reshaped procurement processes across the sector. As universities and colleges move forward in a post-pandemic world, procurement will continue to play a critical role in ensuring institutions are resilient, cost-effective, and aligned with their long-term goals. The lessons learned from the pandemic will likely inform procurement strategies for years to come, emphasizing the importance of flexibility, sustainability, and strategic partnerships in an increasingly uncertain world.

 

Published By: Aize Perez

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of New York Weekly.