Dr. Sharon Spano on Why High-Achieving Leaders Keep Hitting the Same Wall
Photo Courtesy: Dr. Sharon Spano

Dr. Sharon Spano on Why High-Achieving Leaders Keep Hitting the Same Wall

By: Kate Sarmiento

Plenty of high-achieving leaders have read every book on the shelf and still catch themselves reacting to conflict the exact same way they did five years ago. That’s the question Dr. Sharon Spano and her team at Spano & Company sit with every day while coaching high-impact leaders. If you’ve sat through another seminar promising the same handful of principles, communicate more clearly, build trust, delegate, be vulnerable- and walked out thinking, “I already know this, so why can’t I do it,” there’s nothing wrong with you. You’re also far from alone. Something else is running underneath that advice, and it has very little to do with how many books sit on your shelf or how many keynotes you’ve nodded along to with a notepad in hand.

Here’s the part nobody likes to admit. Leadership burnout climbed to 56% in 2024, up from 52% the year before, and nearly half of all companies lost at least half their leadership team within the past year (Source: LHH, 2025). Meanwhile, seven out of ten leaders say their stress increased significantly the moment they stepped into their current role, not gradually, but almost immediately (Source: DDI Global Leadership Forecast, 2025, via Forbes). If the standard playbook actually solved the problem it claims to solve, those numbers should be shrinking every year, not climbing. They’re not. That gap between “I did everything right” and “I still feel like I’m failing” is exactly where this conversation needs to start.

Same Advice, Same Wall

Walk into almost any leadership training, and the slides look familiar. Empower your team. Lead with empathy. Give people autonomy. None of that is wrong, and this isn’t about tearing down good advice for the sake of it. The problem shows up when a leader applies every one of those principles, sometimes for years, and still ends up back in the same argument with the same person, or the same late-night spiral about whether the business is actually going to hold together. That’s not a communication failure. It’s a pattern doing what patterns do, which is repeat, no matter how many new tools get thrown at it.

Most leadership development treats people like a set of behaviors that need adjusting, the way a golf coach might adjust a swing. Straighten out the delegation, tighten the feedback loop, add a weekly one-on-one, and the leader should improve. Sometimes that works, for a while. But plenty of leaders can execute a textbook difficult conversation and still walk away with their stomach in knots, because they learned the skill while the underlying reaction never actually changed. In 2023, a record number of CEOs stepped down, and roughly half of U.S. employees said they’d take a pay cut for a better quality of life (Source: Mercer Global Talent Trends, 2024, via Forbes), which says this isn’t a small group struggling quietly somewhere in the middle of the org chart. It’s happening at the very top, to people who by every external measure have already figured it out.

The Real Reason Coaching Stalls Out

Harvard Graduate School of Education researchers Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey have spent decades studying why capable, motivated people fail to change even when they genuinely want to. Kegan describes their process as a kind of mental X-ray, a way of showing someone the ways their own mindset creates errors and distortions that block new ideas before those ideas ever get a fair shot (Source: Harvard Graduate School of Education, 2020). Their research found that most change efforts fail because they focus only on behavior, when real change usually requires shifting the mindset underneath the behavior too. A leader might say she wants to delegate more and mean it completely, while an unconscious belief that letting go equals losing value quietly overrides the intention every time a task lands on her desk.

This is the piece Spano zeroes in on with clients. Her background in Human and Organizational Systems, built over 25-plus years working inside corporate and private business settings, treats a leader’s struggles as symptoms of something developmental rather than something purely behavioral. During a private Systemic Mapping session, the goal isn’t to hand someone a new communication script. It’s to surface the specific pattern shaping how that person responds to pressure, conflict, and authority in the first place. It’s common for a leader to handle a hostile board meeting without blinking and completely unravel the moment a spouse questions a decision at home, and that’s not a coincidence. It’s the same wiring showing up in two different rooms.

It’s also worth separating out something that gets lumped together all the time. Burnout is exhaustion. Emptiness is different, and a leader can be well rested, hitting every target, and still feel it. Spano calls this the Emptiness of Success, the specific ache of checking every box on the list and still lying awake wondering what any of it was actually for. A leader doesn’t have to be burned out to feel empty, and treating the two as the same problem is part of why so much leadership advice misses the mark.

It’s Not a Skills Gap. It’s a Development Gap.

Adult development doesn’t stop the day someone becomes a manager, a VP, or a founder. People move through recognizable stages of how they make meaning, relate to authority, and define success, and most leadership programs never touch that layer. Spano’s Potential Unleashed Intensive spends real time here, working through what she calls the 12 stages of human development and showing how a person’s current stage shapes their entire experience of time, money, and success, often in ways that look like a leadership problem on the surface but sit much deeper underneath.

A leader who can’t stop micromanaging, no matter how many times someone tells her to let go, usually isn’t missing information about delegation. Standard advice says trust your team more. But if the underlying assumption is “if I’m not controlling everything, it will fall apart, and that will prove I’m not enough,” no amount of trust-building exercises will touch that belief, because the exercises are aimed at the behavior instead of the assumption driving it. Research on executive coaching backs this up. Studies looking at coaching’s effect on leaders have found real, measurable improvement in psychological well-being, but researchers have also pointed out that very few programs track burnout and engagement together over time, which means most leaders never get a clear read on whether the coaching actually touched the root of the problem or just the surface of it (Source: Frontiers in Psychology, 2023). That gap between surface-level coaching and root-level change is exactly why so many capable, hardworking leaders keep hitting the same wall.

Ready to Find Out What’s Actually Running the Show?

None of this means leadership advice is useless, or that trust, communication, and vulnerability don’t matter. They do. But they can only take a leader as far as the pattern underneath allows, and for many high-achievers, that pattern has been running in the background since long before the first promotion. If any of this sounds less like a hypothetical and more like a Tuesday, it might be worth looking past the next book or podcast episode and toward the actual source of the loop.

Dr. Sharon Spano’s private Systemic Mapping sessions are built to surface that source, the hidden dynamics driving the same frustrating cycle year after year, so it can finally be addressed instead of managed around. Learn more about Systemic Mapping and the Potential Unleashed Intensive through Spano & Company, and take the first real step toward leading from a place that isn’t running on autopilot.

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of New York Weekly.